The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Martina A Caretta 2022

Martina Angela Caretta

Senior lecturer

Martina A Caretta 2022

“Shale gas development will bring local economic benefits”. An analysis of central Appalachian landowners' lived experience and situated knowledge of extractivism

Author

  • Martina Angela Caretta
  • Erin Carlson
  • Rachael Hood

Summary, in English

Extractivism is notorious for causing environmental destruction, resulting in worsened living conditions for those residing near sites of, among other processes, mining, logging, and hydraulic fracturing. Yet, companies can operate in certain areas because they mobilize narratives, often supported by governments and local authorities, asserting that extraction will bring local economic benefits in the forms of employment, improved general living standards, and economic compensation. In this article, we examine this core argument, focusing on shale gas development that has taken place since the mid-2000s in central Appalachia. We ground our analysis in original material gathered between 2020 and 2022 through 55 interviews with land and mineral owners. Extractivism is a capitalistic complex that operates on a systemic level with similar structures independently of the context where it is taking place. In this article, we zoom in on its operations and consequences at a micro level. We show how the logic of critical infrastructures is enacted by energy companies through compensation and experienced by residents through impacts on livelihood. While this qualitative analysis does not quantify local economic gains or losses, there is a preponderance of evidence showing that land and mineral owners have received limited and discontinuous compensation often compounded with the loss of usable land or forest. We argue that the extraction of raw fossil materials not only contributes to environmental destruction and climate change but is fundamentally grounded in unequal power relations that heighten social vulnerability and potentially destroy livelihoods.

Department/s

  • Department of Human Geography
  • LU Profile Area: Human rights

Publishing year

2024-08

Language

English

Publication/Series

Geoforum

Volume

154

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Economic Geography

Keywords

  • Appalachia
  • Economic compensation
  • Extractivism
  • Gas pipelines
  • Hydraulic fracturing
  • Lived experience
  • Situated knowledge

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0016-7185